Score: 0

"Made at PlayCrafter.com"

submission: Acrobat's PlayGround

date: June 22, 2009

And therefore, a violation of the rules.

Also level design needs work.

Score: 6

"Good."

submission: Stamper's Quest For Fags

date: June 22, 2009

Gameplay aside, the graphics and overall presentation is very well done.

However, the gameplay needs work. Eventually, it becomes annoying (Stamper's ooh-ing and etc) and gets boring. Endless running in the desert is not endlessly fun.

Also, I had no idea that the cactus were bad until I listened to the ooh-ing. That should be explained.

(LOL at bonus level)

Score: 8

"Well done."

submission: Moon Groove

date: June 22, 2009

Animation, concept, and overall enjoyment value was good.

However, some frames of animation, specifically those when a segment was looped (circling around rocket and rocket chasing man) didn't seem to fit well together.

Score: 8

"Awesome."

submission: FRED - Animated Series

date: June 18, 2009

A suitable tribute to Fred.

You could have lengthened it, though.

Score: 7

"Too Difficult."

submission: Use Boxmen

date: June 18, 2009

Overall, the presentation and general theme was very suiting and pleasant. Graphics were very good and programming was flawless.

However, the gameplay was... difficult. "Experiment with different boxmen" was a very vague statement, and thus confused me to a point where I was simply not enjoying the game. The puzzles themselves were also too confusing and had little enjoyment value.

I also disliked how too much of the game was based on speed. Some challenges were quite obvious to execute, but just required too much speed to be enjoyable. Puzzle games should be much slower and should focus on the mind, not the body.

In other words, simply make the challenges less difficult. I would also add to make the game longer.

(BTW, the walkthrough was very useful, but an in-game adaptation would be much better.)

Score: 7

"Good game, but it could be better."

submission: Dino Run

date: June 17, 2009

First of all, graphics were awesome, and programming, overall, was great. It entertained me for several hours.

However, it could be a lot better if you refined the gameplay. In order to be a successful player you need to spend a lot of time playing. Why? To get upgrades. Anybody could get full upgrades and pass everything really quickly. In contrast, most people will have lots of difficulty passing anything without upgrades. So, you ought to change that.

Also, there needs to be more instructions. Super eggs are confusing and unknown until the player actually collects them, and the same applies to milestones. It would be nice if the milestones were known as to make it easier to achieve them.

On occasion, I also encountered some glitches. Sometimes, a triceratops or stegosaurus can trap you in a crevice with no chance of escape. Also, red pterodactyls can be quite annoying and erroneous. Those need to be fixed.

Also, just for fun, you should make it possible to choose which color runner you want.

Score: 9

"Good."

submission: Roller Coaster Junkie

date: May 8, 2009

Fantastic graphics!

However, the singing is a little strange...

Score: 8

"Awesome."

submission: Robot Dinosaurs

date: April 18, 2009

That was great. Multiple characters, absolutely no glitches, and a funny storyline and mood made this game enjoyable.

However, this game is a little bit on the short side. Not horrendously short, but it would surely benefit from at least another level or two.

Score: 8

"Well done..."

submission: Hot Girl in the ComicShop

date: April 10, 2009

The script and music was fantastic.

However, the graphics need polishing.

Score: 10

"Excellent."

submission: Blockhead: Episode 11

date: January 16, 2009

I am VERY disappointed that this didn't make it for Halloween. It would have won the contest by far.

Anyway, that was hilarious, well-animated, and had a good script.